UP Fintech Holding (MEX:TIGR N) Beneish M-Score: -2.90 (As of Jun. 27, 2026)


MEX:TIGR N UP Fintech Holding Ltd MEX:TIGR N
72 GF Score
Price MXN81.00
GF Value MXN164.95
Valuation Possible Value Trap
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is UP Fintech Holding Beneish M-Score?

UP Fintech Holding MEX:TIGR N -1.85% 72 Beneish M-Score is -2.90 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus rates MEX:TIGR N with a GF Score™ of 72/100 and a GF Value™ of MXN164.95 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 702 Capital Markets companies, UP Fintech Holding ranks better than 79.91% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.9 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MEX:TIGR N' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.9   Med: -2.6   Max: 0.86
Current: -2.9

During the past 10 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of UP Fintech Holding was 0.86. The lowest was -2.90. And the median was -2.60.


UP Fintech Holding Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

UP Fintech Holding Beneish M-Score Chart

UP Fintech Holding Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.59 -2.70 -2.61 -2.09 -2.90

UP Fintech Holding Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2.90 0.00

MEX:TIGR N vs OPY, LCLN, RHNO: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Capital Markets subindustry, UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


UP Fintech Holding Beneish M-Score vs Capital Markets Industry

For the Capital Markets industry and Financial Services sector, UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score falls into.


MEX:TIGR N
72GF Score
UP Fintech Holding Ltd MEX:TIGR N
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

UP Fintech Holding Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of UP Fintech Holding for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.729+0.528 * 0.9376+0.404 * 0.9194+0.892 * 1.3496+0.115 * 1.0421
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.7921+4.679 * -0.139165-0.327 * 0.9977
=-3.09

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Total Receivables was MXN69,442 Mil.
Revenue was MXN11,021 Mil.
Gross Profit was MXN7,641 Mil.
Total Current Assets was MXN146,781 Mil.
Total Assets was MXN148,124 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was MXN314 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was MXN52 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was MXN2,379 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was MXN131,432 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was MXN994 Mil.
Net Income was MXN3,077 Mil.
Gross Profit was MXN-17 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was MXN23,708 Mil.
Total Receivables was MXN70,579 Mil.
Revenue was MXN8,166 Mil.
Gross Profit was MXN5,308 Mil.
Total Current Assets was MXN131,974 Mil.
Total Assets was MXN133,295 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was MXN314 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was MXN55 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was MXN2,225 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was MXN115,993 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was MXN3,450 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(69442.295 / 11020.659) / (70579.193 / 8165.862)
=6.301102 / 8.643202
=0.729

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(5308.276 / 8165.862) / (7640.863 / 11020.659)
=0.650057 / 0.693322
=0.9376

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (146781.152 + 313.983) / 148124.449) / (1 - (131973.743 + 314.108) / 133295.286)
=0.006949 / 0.007558
=0.9194

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=11020.659 / 8165.862
=1.3496

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(54.725 / (54.725 + 314.108)) / (52.127 / (52.127 + 313.983))
=0.148373 / 0.142381
=1.0421

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(2379.075 / 11020.659) / (2225.345 / 8165.862)
=0.215874 / 0.272518
=0.7921

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((993.897 + 131431.869) / 148124.449) / ((3449.7 + 115993.397) / 133295.286)
=0.894017 / 0.896079
=0.9977

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(3077.174 - -16.907 - 23707.835) / 148124.449
=-0.139165

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

UP Fintech Holding has a M-score of -3.09 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -2.90 mean?
UP Fintech Holding (MEX:TIGR N) has a Beneish M-Score of -2.90 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on UP Fintech Holding and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, UP Fintech Holding ranks #141 out of 702 companies in the Capital Markets industry, placing it in the top 20.1%.
Is UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score too high?
UP Fintech Holding's current Beneish M-Score is -2.90. Based on the distribution chart, UP Fintech Holding ranks #141 out of 702 companies in the Capital Markets industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, UP Fintech Holding has a GF Score™ of 72/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does UP Fintech Holding's Beneish M-Score compare to OPY and LCLN?
According to the Capital Markets industry distribution chart, UP Fintech Holding ranks #141 out of 702 companies for Beneish M-Score. This places UP Fintech Holding in the top 20% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Capital Markets company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Capital Markets industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on UP Fintech Holding and its competitors. UP Fintech Holding's current Beneish M-Score is -2.90. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is UP Fintech Holding stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, UP Fintech Holding (MEX:TIGR N) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is MXN164.95, compared to a current price of MXN81.00 — trading 50.9% below its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -2.90. UP Fintech Holding's overall GF Score™ is 72/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For UP Fintech Holding (MEX:TIGR N), the current Beneish M-Score is -2.90 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is UP Fintech Holding (MEX:TIGR N) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, UP Fintech Holding stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of MXN81.00 is trading 50.9% below its estimated GF Value™ of MXN164.95. GuruFocus considers UP Fintech Holding to be Possible Value Trap.

Key valuation signals for MEX:TIGR N:

  • Beneish M-Score: -2.90
  • GF Value™: MXN164.95 vs. price of MXN81.00 (50.9% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 72/100 with 2 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the MEX:TIGR N stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


UP Fintech Holding Business Description

Other Exchanges TIGR:USA0A32:UK1M5:Germany
Address No. 16 Taiyanggong Middle Road, 18th Floor, Grandyvic Building, No. 1 Building, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CHN, 100020
UP Fintech Holding Ltd is an online brokerage firm focusing on Chinese investors. Its trading platform enables investors to trade in equities and other financial instruments on multiple exchanges of stocks and other derivatives. The company offers its customers brokerage and value-added services, including trade order placement and execution, margin financing, account management, investor education, community discussion, and customer support.
72GF Score

Get the complete analysis for MEX:TIGR N

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

MXN81.00
Price
MXN164.95
GF Value